Advanced Tax & Estate Planning: Wealth Preservation Strategies (Part 3 of 4)
Estimated reading time: 8 min
In our previous posts, we exposed how investment advisor fees can quietly drain your wealth, as well as explored advanced strategies most advisors neglect. Now we'll tackle another concerning issue: the sophisticated estate and tax planning strategies that AUM advisors often won't recommend because implementing them would reduce their fees.
For families with significant wealth, this conflict can cost millions. Estate planning frequently involves moving assets into trusts, implementing 1, or structuring business entities that don't generate ongoing investment advisor fees. The result? Many wealthy families receive suboptimal advice because their advisor's compensation model creates inherent conflicts.
Here are the advanced strategies every high-net-worth family should know about, and why fee structure alignment matters more than most people realize.
Advanced Estate Planning Coordination
Federal Estate Tax Landscape (2025)
Threshold | Tax Rate | Planning Trigger | Common Strategies |
---|---|---|---|
$13.99 million (individual) | 40% | Net worth >$5M | Annual gifting, trusts |
$27.98 million (married couple) | 40% | Combined >$10M | Advanced trust strategies |
Annual gift exclusion: $19,000 | 0% | All wealth levels | Systematic gifting programs |
Note: Estate and gift tax exemptions are subject to legislative changes and may revert to lower amounts in future years.
Estate Plan Integration
Comprehensive financial advisors work with estate attorneys to ensure your financial strategies align with your estate planning goals, creating seamless coordination between investment management and wealth transfer.
What's involved:
- Beneficiary coordination: Ensuring all accounts have proper primary and contingent beneficiaries
- Trust funding: Coordinating asset transfers to revocable and irrevocable trusts
- Tax minimization: Reducing estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes
- Liquidity planning: Ensuring the estate has sufficient cash flow for taxes and expenses
Fee structure consideration: Estate planning often involves moving assets into trusts or other structures that may affect advisor compensation. When implementing estate strategies, ensure your advisor's recommendations prioritize optimal outcomes for your family rather than maximizing their fee revenue.
Advanced Estate Strategies
Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs): Transfer appreciating assets while retaining income stream, particularly effective for volatile assets.
Example: A founder with pre-IPO company stock transfers $1 million to a 3-year GRAT with 3% annuity rate. If the company goes public and stock appreciates to $4 million, $3 million+ passes to heirs gift-tax-free.
Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (IDGTs): Sell assets to trust, pay income taxes on trust earnings (additional gift to beneficiaries).
Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs): Pool family assets, transfer limited partnership interests at discounted values.
Multi-Generational Wealth Transfer
Dynasty Trusts: Create trusts that can last for multiple generations in states without rule against perpetuities.
Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Planning: Allocate $13.99 million GST exemption to maximize multi-generational wealth transfer.
Business Owner Tax Optimization
Advanced Retirement Plan Strategies
Business owners have access to significantly higher contribution limits than employees:
Plan Type | Max Annual Contribution | Best For | Tax Benefits |
---|---|---|---|
SEP-IRA | Up to $70,000 | Simple administration | Immediate deduction |
Solo 401(k) | Up to $81,250 | Self-employed with spouse | Employee + employer contributions |
Cash Balance Plan | $100,000-$400,000+ | High-income, stable business | Massive tax deferral |
Defined Benefit Plan | $275,000+ | Very high income, older owners | Maximum possible deferral |
S-Corporation Election Benefits
Strategic Income Splitting: Convert self-employment income to wages + distributions, potentially saving 15.3% self-employment tax on distribution portion.
Example: A business owner with $350,000 profit elects S-Corp status, takes a $140,000 reasonable salary, and receives a $210,000 distribution. This saves approximately $12,750 in self-employment taxes annually (15.3% on distribution portion, minus additional payroll tax costs).
Fee structure consideration: When implementing business tax strategies, consider whether your advisor's compensation model enables objective recommendations. Some optimal business structures may involve assets or strategies outside traditional portfolio management, requiring advisors who can provide unbiased guidance regardless of impact on their fees.
Business Succession Planning
Succession Planning Timeline:
Years Before Exit | Key Planning Activities | Professional Team |
---|---|---|
10-15 years | Business valuation, structure optimization | CPA, attorney, advisor |
5-10 years | Buy-sell agreements, management transition | Business consultant, advisor |
2-5 years | Tax optimization, buyer identification | M&A attorney, investment banker |
Exit year (0-1 years) | Transaction execution, wealth transition | Full professional team |
Risk Management & Insurance Planning
Comprehensive Insurance Portfolio Analysis
Insurance needs change significantly as wealth grows. Comprehensive advisors evaluate all coverage to ensure adequate protection without over-insurance.
Insurance Type | Coverage Range | Key Considerations | Annual Cost Range |
---|---|---|---|
Term Life | 10-20x income | Temporary needs, cost-effective | $1,000-$5,000 |
Permanent Life* (Often not worth the fees) | Estate planning needs | Cash value, estate liquidity | $10,000-$100,000+ |
Disability | 60-70% of income | Own-occupation definition | $3,000-$15,000 |
Umbrella Liability | $1-10+ million | Asset protection | $500-$2,000 |
Disability Insurance Optimization for High-Income Earners
Critical for high earners since employer coverage often caps at $5,000-$10,000 monthly.
Coverage considerations:
- Own-occupation vs. any-occupation definitions
- Benefit periods: To age 65, 67, or lifetime
- Residual benefits: Partial payments for reduced capacity
- Cost of living adjustments: 3% compound inflation protection
- Future increase options: Ability to increase coverage without medical exams
Target coverage: 60-70% of income through combined employer and individual policies.
The Life Insurance Trap
Estate Liquidity Planning: Use life insurance to provide cash for estate taxes and expenses.
Business Succession: Fund buy-sell agreements and key person coverage.
Charitable Planning Integration: Use life insurance to "replace" charitable gifts for heirs.
Example: An executive with a $5 million estate gifts $1 million to charity and purchases a $1 million life insurance policy to "replace" the gift for their children. The executive receives a charitable deduction, reduces estate taxes, and maintains the family inheritance.
While the above strategies are often praised by advisors who receive large commissions from selling permanent life insurance like whole and universal life, the premiums often make these strategies ineffective. Furthermore, the funds used to pay these premiums represent an opportunity cost. This money could otherwise be invested in assets with potentially higher returns, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate. Over a long period, the cumulative effect of these lost investment gains usually surpass the death benefit of the life insurance policy.
Premiums
Large premiums are not the only disadvantage, a common misconception is that life insurance proceeds are always tax-free. While the death benefit is generally not subject to income tax for the beneficiaries, it can be included in the deceased's taxable estate if the policy is not structured correctly. This can inadvertently increase the very estate tax burden the policy was intended to alleviate.
Taxes
To avoid this, estate planners often recommend the use of an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT). By transferring ownership of the policy to the trust, the death benefit can be excluded from the estate. However, this solution introduces its own set of complexities and costs. Establishing and maintaining an ILIT requires legal and administrative fees. Moreover, once the policy is in the trust, the original owner relinquishes all control. This means they cannot change the beneficiaries, borrow against the policy's cash value, or surrender the policy.
Inflexibility
The irrevocable nature of an ILIT highlights a major drawback of this strategy: inflexibility. Life circumstances and financial needs can change, but an irrevocable trust is, by its nature, difficult and sometimes impossible to alter. This can become problematic if family dynamics shift, the value of the estate changes significantly, or the policyholder needs to access the cash value of the policy for unforeseen expenses.
Advanced Tax Planning Strategies
Multi-State Tax Planning
For high-income professionals who are mobile or have business interests in multiple states:
Strategic Considerations:
- Domicile establishment: Choosing optimal state of residence
- Income sourcing: Understanding where different types of income are taxed
- Trust situs planning: Locating trusts in favorable jurisdictions
- Business structure optimization: Organizing entities in tax-efficient states
Potential savings: $3,000-$15,000+ annually for mobile high-income professionals
Charitable Giving Strategies
Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs): Contribute appreciated securities, receive full deduction, avoid capital gains tax.
Advanced Example: An executive has $75,000 of highly appreciated stock (cost basis $15,000). Instead of selling and paying $12,000 in capital gains taxes, they donate it to a DAF. The executive receives a $75,000 deduction (saving $28,000 in taxes at the 37% bracket) and avoids $12,000 in capital gains. Total tax benefit: $40,000.
Fee structure benefit: Fee-only financial planners can recommend optimal charitable strategies regardless of whether those strategies involve assets they manage, while AUM advisors might discourage strategies that reduce their fees.
Pre-Retirement Planning (Ages 50-65)
Enhanced Catch-up Contribution Maximization
2025 Enhanced Limits:
Account Type | Standard Limit | Age 50+ Catch-up | Age 60-63 Enhanced* | Total Possible | Tax Savings (37% bracket) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
401(k) | $23,500 | $7,500 | $11,250 | $34,750** | $12,858 |
IRA | $7,000 | $1,000 | N/A | $8,000 | $2,960 |
HSA | $4,300 | $1,000 | N/A | $5,300 | $1,961 |
Total | $34,800 | $9,500 | $11,250 | $48,050*** | $17,779 |
*Enhanced catch-up applies to ages 60-63 and replaces the regular catch-up contribution
**Total for ages 60-63 with enhanced catch-up
***Total assumes maximum enhanced catch-up scenario
Healthcare Planning Bridge
Strategic Considerations for Early Retirees:
- COBRA continuation coverage (18-36 months)
- ACA marketplace plans and subsidies
- Healthcare sharing ministries
- Bridge insurance strategies until Medicare eligibility at 65
Social Security Optimization
Advanced Claiming Strategies: Analyzing claiming strategies can increase lifetime benefits by $100,000-$300,000+ for high-earning couples.
Key Factors:
- Longevity assumptions
- Spousal benefit coordination
- Tax impact of Social Security income
- Delayed retirement credits (8% per year from full retirement age to 70)
Professional Team Coordination
The Advisor as Quarterback
Comprehensive advisors serve as the central coordinator for your professional team:
Team Members:
- CPA/Tax Preparer: Year-round tax planning coordination
- Estate Attorney: Estate planning implementation and updates
- Insurance Agent: Risk management strategy implementation
- Business Attorney: Business structure and succession planning
- Investment Banker: Exit planning and transaction support
Value of Coordination: Ensuring all professionals work toward common goals rather than in silos, often preventing costly mistakes and missed opportunities.
When Advanced Planning Makes Sense
Net Worth Thresholds
Net Worth Range | Typical Planning Focus | Primary Strategies |
---|---|---|
$500k - $1.5M | Tax optimization, basic estate planning | Retirement planning, tax planning |
$1.5M - $5M | Estate planning, business strategies | Trust planning, tax optimization |
$5M+ | Multi-generational wealth, complex structures | Dynasty trusts, advanced strategies |
Complexity Indicators
- Business ownership or partnership interests
- Multiple income sources across different tax treatments
- Charitable giving goals exceeding $15,000 annually
- Multi-generational wealth transfer objectives
- Estate planning needs involving trusts or advanced structures
Fee Structure Considerations for Advanced Planning
Why Transparent Fee Structures Excel at Complex Planning
Alignment Considerations:
When selecting an advisor for estate planning:
- Can they recommend whatever structure truly optimizes your estate goals?
- Do they work seamlessly with estate attorneys and tax professionals?
- Is their compensation tied to successful outcomes rather than asset retention?
- Can they focus purely on your family's best interests?
Value Impact Example: For a $3 million estate, optimal trust planning might involve moving $1 million into irrevocable trusts. Some advisors may face compensation conflicts with such strategies, while others can focus purely on your family's best interests.
Cost-Benefit Analysis for Estate Planning
Value Creation Examples:
- Estate tax optimization: $150,000+ in tax savings for $5M+ estates
- Business succession planning: $250,000+ in optimized value transfer
- Advanced retirement plans: $25,000-$100,000+ annual tax deferrals for business owners
- Charitable planning strategies: $25,000+ in annual tax benefits
Real-World Impact: A business owner implementing a cash balance plan, S-Corp election, and optimal estate structure could save $75,000+ annually in taxes while preserving $1M+ for heirs through proper planning.
Why Fee Structure Matters for Estate Planning
Estate planning often involves moving significant assets into trusts, implementing gifting strategies, or structuring entities that may affect advisor compensation. When selecting an advisor for complex estate planning:
Key Considerations:
- Can they recommend structures that truly optimize your estate, regardless of compensation impact?
- Do they work collaboratively with estate attorneys and tax professionals?
- Is their guidance focused on long-term family outcomes?
Research Insight: Academic studies suggest that transparent fee structures tend to correlate with more objective advisory recommendations, particularly important for complex estate planning decisions that significantly impact multi-generational wealth.
Academic Research Supporting Advanced Planning
Estate Planning Effectiveness Studies
Research from academic institutions and professional organizations demonstrates the significant value of comprehensive estate planning:
Key Research Findings:
- Studies show that proper estate planning can reduce total transfer taxes by 15-40% for high-net-worth families
- Academic research indicates that coordinated professional teams (advisor, attorney, CPA) produce better outcomes than siloed planning
- CFA Institute research emphasizes that behavioral coaching during estate planning transitions provides substantial value beyond technical expertise
Tax Strategy Research
Professional Literature Findings:
- Research demonstrates that systematic tax planning can add 100-300 basis points annually for high-income earners
- Studies show that multi-state tax planning strategies can provide significant savings for mobile professionals
- Academic analysis confirms that charitable giving strategies, when properly implemented, provide substantial tax benefits while supporting philanthropic goals
Coming Up Next
In Part 4, we'll explore specialized services for executives and business owners, including:
- Executive compensation planning for stock options, RSUs, and complex equity structures
- Advanced business tax strategies and succession planning
- Pre-retirement planning optimization for high earners
- Professional team coordination and behavioral coaching
- Why fee structure alignment becomes even more critical for complex executive and business planning
For executives and business owners, these specialized services often justify the entire cost of working with truly comprehensive financial advisors.
Sources and References
- Internal Revenue Service. "IRS releases tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2025."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Estate Tax."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Retirement plans FAQs regarding SEPs."
- Internal Revenue Service. "One-Participant 401(k) Plans."
- Internal Revenue Service. "401(k) limit increases to $23,500 for 2025, IRA limit remains $7,000."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Self-employment tax (Social Security and Medicare taxes)."
- Social Security Administration. "Delayed Retirement Credits."
- Internal Revenue Service. "S corporations."
- CFA Institute Research and Policy Center. "Behavioral Finance: The Second Generation." December 2, 2025.
- Social Security Administration. "Contribution and Benefit Base."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Topic No. 560, Additional Medicare Tax."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Topic No. 751, Social Security and Medicare Withholding Rates."
- U.S. Thrift Savings Plan. "SECURE Act 2.0, Section 109: Higher Catch-Up Limit to Apply at Age 60, 61, 62, and 63."
- Internal Revenue Service. "Treasury, IRS issue proposed regulations on new Roth catch-up rule, other SECURE 2.0 Act provisions."
- Vanguard. "Quantifying the value add of advice for investors." August 1, 2022.
- Fidelity Investments. "Wealth-transfer strategies | Estate tax planning." March 31, 2025.
- Brookings Institution. "How should we tax the Great Wealth Transfer?" December 12, 2024.
- PwC. "Tax and wealth management planning for your family and business."

What would you like to hear about next?
Would you mind sending us an email telling us what you thought about this post or what you would like to read about in upcoming posts? I want to make sure we discuss topics you care about!
-- Josiah Peterham, Founder